On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:20:28PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Keith Busch <[email protected]> writes: > > been combined. In any case, I think you can get what you're after just > > by moving the gap check after BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGABLE. Does the following > > look ok to you? > > > > Thanks, it does.
Cool, thanks for confirming. > Will you send it or would you like me to do that with your Suggested-by? I'm not confident yet this doesn't break anything, particularly since we moved the gap check after the length check. Just wanted to confirm the concept addressed your concern, but still need to take a closer look and test before submitting.
