Now that the node name has been changed from ehrpwm to pwm the document
should show this proper usage. Also change the unit address in the example
from 0 to the proper physical address value that should be used.
Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcoo...@ti.com>
---
Version 3 changes:
N/A
Version 2 changes:
Changed the unit address for da850 to match the value in the reg property.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt
index 9c100b2..0f9ba50 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt
@@ -15,14 +15,14 @@ Optional properties:
Example:
-ehrpwm0: ehrpwm@0 { /* EHRPWM on am33xx */
+ehrpwm0: pwm@48300200 { /* EHRPWM on am33xx */
compatible = "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
#pwm-cells = <3>;
reg = <0x48300200 0x100>;
ti,hwmods = "ehrpwm0";
};
-ehrpwm0: ehrpwm@0 { /* EHRPWM on da850 */
+ehrpwm0: pwm@300000 { /* EHRPWM on da850 */
compatible = "ti,da850-ehrpwm", "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
#pwm-cells = <3>;
reg = <0x300000 0x2000>;
--
2.7.0
