On 3/22/2016 3:31 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:04:25AM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote: > > Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows > readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what > you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the > discussion is being addressed. > >> I have no intend to break the rules. I am just trying to communicate with UFS >> maintainers that so far gave me no response. Merging in v4.7 is fine, but I >> would like that UFS maintainers give me some feedback about the next steps, >> but >> so far didn't have luck. > > Like I say the next steps are those Arnd gave you: repost after -rc1. > Then give people at least a week or so to respond, people do get busy > and other people are also sending patches. >
Understood, I will repost this patch set after -rc1. I suggest that the UFS maintenance should be revised because the e-mail of ufshcd.c authors are no longer valid and the current maintainer (Vinayak Holikatti) is having a career shift (has you can check in LinkedIn) and probably is not available at the moment to do patch reviews. Thanks, Joao
