On 03/29/2016 07:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
> +config CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
> +     tristate "'schedutil' cpufreq policy governor"
> +     depends on CPU_FREQ
> +     select CPU_FREQ_GOV_ATTR_SET
> +     select IRQ_WORK
> +     help
> +       This governor makes decisions based on the utilization data provided
> +       by the scheduler.  It sets the CPU frequency to be proportional to
> +       the utilization/capacity ratio coming from the scheduler.  If the
> +       utilization is frequency-invariant, the new frequency is also
> +       proportional to the maximum available frequency.  If that is not the
> +       case, it is proportional to the current frequency of the CPU with the
> +       tipping point at utilization/capacity equal to 80%.

This help text implies that the tipping point of 80% applies only to
non-frequency invariant configurations, rather than both. Possible to
rephrase?

...
> +static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
> +                                        unsigned long util, unsigned long 
> max)
> +{
> +     struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
> +     unsigned int max_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> +     u64 last_freq_update_time = sg_policy->last_freq_update_time;
> +     unsigned int j;
> +
> +     if (util == ULONG_MAX)
> +             return max_f;
> +
> +     for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
> +             struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu;
> +             unsigned long j_util, j_max;
> +             u64 delta_ns;
> +
> +             if (j == smp_processor_id())
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             j_sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, j);
> +             /*
> +              * If the CPU utilization was last updated before the previous
> +              * frequency update and the time elapsed between the last update
> +              * of the CPU utilization and the last frequency update is long
> +              * enough, don't take the CPU into account as it probably is
> +              * idle now.
> +              */
> +             delta_ns = last_freq_update_time - j_sg_cpu->last_update;
> +             if ((s64)delta_ns > TICK_NSEC)

>> Why not declare delta_ns as an s64 (also in suguv_should_update_freq)
>> and avoid the cast?
>
> I took this from __update_load_avg(), but it shouldn't matter here.

Did you mean to keep these casts?

thanks,
Steve

Reply via email to