On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:12:30PM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote: > + /* > + * XXX this is slightly incorrect: when the task > + * utilization decreases, we should delay the total > + * utilization change until the task's 0-lag point. > + * But this would require to set the task's "inactive > + * timer" when the task is not inactive. > + */
Could you quickly remind me why this is a problem? The timeline does continue running right? So even if the task isn't active now, it will still reach its 0-lag point. > __dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw); > __dl_add(dl_b, new_bw); > err = 0;
