On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > This is harmless because the function is not called, but we're trying to > return negative error codes so the function needs to return an int > instead of a u16. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
That patch looks fine, but the function appears to be completely unused, perhaps just a patch to remove it would be better? Thanks, Charles
