Hi Hugh, On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please replace the > huge-tmpfs-try-to-allocate-huge-pages-split-into-a-team-fix.patch > you added to your tree by this one: nothing wrong with Stephen's, > but in this case I think the source is better off if we simply > remove that BUILD_BUG() instead of adding an IS_ENABLED(): > fixes build problem seen on arm when putting together linux-next. > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> > --- > mm/shmem.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > --- a/mm/shmem.c > +++ b/mm/shmem.c > @@ -1744,7 +1744,6 @@ static inline struct page *shmem_hugetea > > static inline void shmem_disband_hugeteam(struct page *page) > { > - BUILD_BUG(); > } > > static inline void shmem_added_to_hugeteam(struct page *page,
I have replaced my fix with the above in today's linux-next. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
