On Friday, April 29, 2016 04:08:16 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 19-04-16, 19:39, Steve Muckle wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > index 20f0a4e114d1..429d3a5b9866 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > @@ -248,6 +248,20 @@ static void dbs_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
> > schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &policy_dbs->work);
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +static inline void dbs_irq_work_queue(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs,
> > + int cpu)
> > +{
> > + irq_work_queue_on(&policy_dbs->irq_work, cpu);
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static inline void dbs_irq_work_queue(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs,
> > + int cpu)
> > +{
> > + irq_work_queue(&policy_dbs->irq_work);
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> Any clue, why we don't have a non-SMP version of irq_work_queue_on(), Which
> can
> simply call irq_work_queue() ?
Because nobody else needs it?
But I agree that it would be nicer to add the stub to irq_work.h.
