On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 05:37:16PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return > > struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via > > the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk > > pointers with a struct clk_lookup. Luckily, clkdev already > > operates on struct clk_hw pointers, except for the registration > > facing APIs where it converts struct clk pointers into struct > > clk_hw pointers almost immediately. > > > > Let's add clk_hw based registration APIs so that we can skip the > > conversion step and provide a way for clk provider drivers to > > operate exclusively on clk_hw structs. This way we clearly > > split the API between consumers and providers. > > > > Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> > > --- > > Applied to clk-next
It would have been nice if you could wait a little longer. As I've just explained in another email, I've been away last weekend from Thursday 21st through until Tuesday 26th. I then spent Wednesday and Thursday catching up with the resulting backlog of email, and last weekend (30th through to the 2nd May) was a bank holiday weekend in the UK. So there's only been _one_ day that I could have looked at your patches, but unfortunately the little matter of doing stuff for paying customers got in the way. A little more patience would have been nice. I'll try to look at them this evening. Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
