On Mon, 09 May 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 05/09, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 06 May 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > On 01/08, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > > Now we have a clock driver that can control the 32k clock use this > > > > rather than directly controlling the 32k clock from the MFD device. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> > > > > --- > > > > > > Applied to clk-next > > > > If you're going to take the set though the clk tree, don't forget to > > sent out a pull-request of the immutable branch you created. If > > you're not happy to do that, drop the patch and I'll happily oblige. > > > > Oh sorry, I got confused. I thought you acked this mfd patch so I could > take it through the clk tree but it seems you acked them so you > could apply it later without re-reviewing it?
Right, that's what I mean by "for my own reference". Since MFD is more often than not the central/parent device, it's usually easier to tunnel patch sets through the MFD, and I will always sent out a pull-requests out to the other maintainers concerned in order to prevent merge conflicts for Linus. > Either way, I'm going to drop these patches for now and wait for > a v4 because Charles has suggested there are some more issues to > work out. Sure. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
