On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<han...@stressinduktion.org> wrote:

> This looks racy to me as the ksoftirqd could be in the progress to stop
> and we would miss another softirq invocation.

Looking at smpboot_thread_fn(), it looks fine :

                if (!ht->thread_should_run(td->cpu)) {
                        preempt_enable_no_resched();
                        schedule();
                } else {
                        __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
                        preempt_enable();
                        ht->thread_fn(td->cpu);
                }

Reply via email to