In __rwsem_do_wake(), the reader wakeup code will assume a writer
has stolen the lock if the active reader/writer count is not 0.
However, this is not as reliable an indicator as the original
"< RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS" check. If another reader is present, the code
will still break out and exit even if the writer is gone. This patch
changes it to check the same "< RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS" condition to
reduce the chance of false positive.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 007814f..e3a7e06 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -148,9 +148,14 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum 
rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
  try_reader_grant:
                oldcount = rwsem_atomic_update(adjustment, sem) - adjustment;
                if (unlikely(oldcount < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)) {
-                       /* A writer stole the lock. Undo our reader grant. */
-                       if (rwsem_atomic_update(-adjustment, sem) &
-                                               RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
+                       /*
+                        * If the count is still less than RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS
+                        * after removing the adjustment, it is assumed that
+                        * a writer has stolen the lock. We have to undo our
+                        * reader grant.
+                        */
+                       if (rwsem_atomic_update(-adjustment, sem)
+                           < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
                                goto out;
                        /* Last active locker left. Retry waking readers. */
                        goto try_reader_grant;
-- 
1.7.1

Reply via email to