On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 07:16:37PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> When we ran mprotect04(a test case in LTP) infinitely, it would always
> failed after a few seconds. The case can be described briefly that: copy
> a empty function from code area into a new memory area(created by mmap),
> then call mprotect to change the protection to PROT_EXEC. The syscall
> sys_mprotect will finally invoke flush_cache_range, but this function
> currently only invalid icache, the operation of flush dcache is missed.
In the LTP code I see powerpc-specific D-cache / I-cache synchronisation
(i.e. d-cache cleaning followed by I-cache invalidation), so there
appears to be some expectation of userspace maintenance. Hoever, there
is no such ARM-specific I-cache maintenance.
It looks like the test may be missing I-cache maintenance regardless of
the semantics of mprotect in this case.
I have not yet devled into flush_cache_range and how it is called.
Thanks,
Mark.
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/flush.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c b/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
> index dbd12ea..eda4124 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ void flush_cache_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned
> long start,
> unsigned long end)
> {
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)
> - __flush_icache_all();
> + flush_icache_range(start, end);
> }
>
> static void sync_icache_aliases(void *kaddr, unsigned long len)
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
