On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 16:28 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> I would prefer lower case letters. I don't know the SIDs there are at
> them moment, other then Display Port. Do you know them?
>
> I don't think we can ever guarantee that in every case we will be able
> to provide a human readable name for the alternate modes if they are
> vendor defined. We will then potentially still have the names in two
> different forms: "usbc0.displayport" and "usbc0.svid:xxxx". Is that
> something acceptable to everybody?
>
> I guess if it's not, then to only way to go forward would be to always
> just use the svid in the name.
Yes, that is better. It makes more sense to use the number.
We'd get into versioning problems if we use names.
Regards
Oliver
