On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:18:53AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 06:55:04AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > kernelci.org bot <b...@kernelci.org> writes: > > > > > stable-queue boot: 73 boots: 3 failed, 68 passed with 2 offline > > > (v4.6.1-121-g2276ff7d4bf9) > > > > > > Full Boot Summary: > > > https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v4.6.1-121-g2276ff7d4bf9/ > > > Full Build Summary: > > > https://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v4.6.1-121-g2276ff7d4bf9/ > > > > > > Tree: stable-queue > > > Branch: local/linux-4.6.y.queue > > > Git Describe: v4.6.1-121-g2276ff7d4bf9 > > > Git Commit: 2276ff7d4bf9c438832f761ffd525cacf55362cd > > > Git URL: git://server.roeck-us.net/git/linux-stable.git > > > Tested: 28 unique boards, 9 SoC families, 16 builds out of 100 > > > > > > Boot Failures Detected: > > > https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.6.1-121-g2276ff7d4bf9&fail > > > > > > arm64: > > > > > > defconfig: > > > apq8016-sbc: 1 failed lab > > > > > > defconfig+CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y: > > > apq8016-sbc: 1 failed lab > > > > Theses two are real boot regressions, bisections forthcoming. > > > This, plus several arm builds, plus all MIPS builds are failing. > I am out of town, bisecting tonight.
There were a TON of MIPS changes in this release, it's as if those maintainers went on a bug-fixing spree. I wouldn't be surprised if any of them broke things given my lack of ability to test them :( thanks, greg k-h
