On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Sinan Kaya <[email protected]> wrote: > The change introduced in commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce > resource requirements") omitted the initially assigned POSSIBLE penalty > when the IRQ is active.
It would be good to say what can go wrong with that here. > The original code would assign the POSSIBLE value divided by the number > of possible IRQs during initialization. > > Later, if the IRQ is chosen as the active IRQ or if the IRQ is in use > by ISA; additional penalties get added. Thanks, Rafael
