I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c b/drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c
index 6ab35e3..18670c2 100644
--- a/drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c
+++ b/drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c
@@ -52,11 +52,11 @@
 #define VER_NUM  49
 
 static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "enable verbose debug messages");
 
 static int no_imr_cal;
-module_param(no_imr_cal, int, 0444);
+module_param(no_imr_cal, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_imr_cal, "Disable IMR calibration at module init");
 
 
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to