I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c b/sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c index ebc9fdf..0ff0dd8 100644 --- a/sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c +++ b/sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c @@ -53,11 +53,11 @@ static bool nonblock_open = 1; MODULE_AUTHOR("Jaroslav Kysela <[email protected]>, Abramo Bagnara <[email protected]>"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PCM OSS emulation for ALSA."); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -module_param_array(dsp_map, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(dsp_map, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(dsp_map, "PCM device number assigned to 1st OSS device."); -module_param_array(adsp_map, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(adsp_map, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(adsp_map, "PCM device number assigned to 2nd OSS device."); -module_param(nonblock_open, bool, 0644); +module_param(nonblock_open, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(nonblock_open, "Don't block opening busy PCM devices."); MODULE_ALIAS_SNDRV_MINOR(SNDRV_MINOR_OSS_PCM); MODULE_ALIAS_SNDRV_MINOR(SNDRV_MINOR_OSS_PCM1); -- 2.9.2
