On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:38:17AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > Anyway one way that my patch differed was that I had used the flags > > > field to keep the behavior the same for both RT and DL. > > Do you mean "go to max" policy for both, until proper policies will be > implemented in the future?
Yep. > > That happens > > > later on in this series for RT but the DL policy is modified as above. > > > Can the DL policy be left as-is and discussed/modified in a separate > > > series? > > Not that we want to start discussing this point now, if we postpone the > change for later, but I just wanted to point out a difference w.r.t. > what the schedfreq thing was doing: it used to sum contributions from > the different classes, instead of taking the max. We probably never > really discussed on the list what is the right thing to do, though. Yeah I figured that was worth deferring into its own patchset/thread. cheers, Steve