I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c b/drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c index 45f6ebf..4975c73 100644 --- a/drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c +++ b/drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static struct { }; static unsigned int poll_interval = 360; -module_param(poll_interval, uint, 0644); +module_param(poll_interval, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(poll_interval, "battery poll interval in seconds - 0 disables polling"); -- 2.9.2
