I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c
index ece3aef..929a108 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c
@@ -602,5 +602,5 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Linux Networx (http://lnxi.com) Thayne Harbaugh et al\n"
                "Based on.work by Dan Hollis et al");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MC support for Intel e7xxx memory controllers");
-module_param(edac_op_state, int, 0444);
+module_param(edac_op_state, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(edac_op_state, "EDAC Error Reporting state: 0=Poll,1=NMI");
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to