I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c 
b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c
index a62c01e..69719c7 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 #define MAX_XFER_SIZE  64
 
 static unsigned int verbose;
-module_param(verbose, int, 0644);
+module_param(verbose, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(verbose, "Set Verbosity level");
 
 static int stv6110x_read_reg(struct stv6110x_state *stv6110x, u8 reg, u8 *data)
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to