I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/edac/x38_edac.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/edac/x38_edac.c b/drivers/edac/x38_edac.c index 314cf5c..7849eaf 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/x38_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/x38_edac.c @@ -523,5 +523,5 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Cluster Computing, Inc. Hitoshi Mitake"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MC support for Intel X38 memory hub controllers"); -module_param(edac_op_state, int, 0444); +module_param(edac_op_state, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(edac_op_state, "EDAC Error Reporting state: 0=Poll,1=NMI"); -- 2.9.2
