On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 2016-08-18 19:53, Paul Moore wrote: >> These patches look fine to me; the only comment I have is that these >> should probably be combined into a single patch to avoid >> cherry-picking of individual pieces, e.g. skipping the feature bitmap >> or AUDIT_SESSION_SET support. I can do that when I merge the patches, >> no need to resend unless you really want to ... >> >> However, the bigger issue is coordination with the userspace patches. >> I really don't like merging kernel patches until Steve OK's the >> corresponding userspace patches. > > Well, some thought went in to making the two behave properly in the > absence of an update of the other. This was the primary reason for the > re-spin. That part of the process is working, since it was Steve's > feedback that provoked the respin.
The issues isn't so much in making the different bits behave under different circumstances - they need to do that period - the issue is that I don't want to include new functionality in the kernel that doesn't have a user (or one on the horizon). -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com