On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote: > > While this would be good to get in, I don't see any particular urgency > here. This seems like it'd be reasonable for v4.9.
Agreed, looks ok to me. It certainly does not look like a new
regression or like a serious problem issue in practice. So 4.9 sounds
appropriate.
Linus
