> In Markus' defence, he does occasionally write okay patches, > (for example the kmalloc(a * b) => kmalloc_array(a, b) changes > get my small tick of approval)
Thanks for another bit of acceptance for this kind of software change. > however he also submits a lot of patches which are little more than moving > stuff around This is true to some degree. > pointlessly. Do we agree to disagree on the value of some collateral software evolutions I'm proposing for a while? > I really wish he'd concentrate on the former rather than the latter. I am on the way for such a software development adventure. There are further improvement opportunities to consider besides the main route, aren't there? > He's not another Nick Krause. Are you going to remember me under an other nickname anyhow? Regards, Markus
