Hi Andrew,

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 12:27:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 08:27:36 +0800 kbuild test robot <[email protected]> wrote:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc4 next-20160825]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for 
convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/chengang-emindsoft-com-cn/arch-all-include-asm-bitops-Use-bool-instead-of-int-for-all-bit-test-functions/20160828-230301
config: s390-default_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.4.0-6) 5.4.0 20160609
reproduce:
        wget 
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
 -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=s390

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:36:0,
                    from fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1:
>> arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h:176:15: error: unknown type name 'bool'
    static inline bool
                  ^
   arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h:187:15: error: unknown type name 'bool'
    static inline bool

My s390 cross compiler doesn't like that config.  Can someone test this?

Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>

It works fine with Debian's gcc-6-s390x-linux-gnu and crosstool gcc:

https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.9.0/x86_64-gcc-4.9.0-nolibc_s390x-linux.tar.xz

--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h~a
+++ a/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#error only <linux/bitops.h> can be included directly
#endif

+#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/typecheck.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <asm/barrier.h>

Regards,
Fengguang

Reply via email to