> Hi! Here is my second regression report for Linux 4.8. It lists 11
> regressions. 5 of them are new; 5 mentioned in the last report two
> weeks ago got fixed.
> FWIW: A small detail: I did not include "Regression - SATA disks behind
> USB ones on v4.8-rc1, breaking boot. [Re: Who reordered my disks]"
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg144871.html ) in below list
> report. The discussion mentions that device names like /dev/sd? are not
> considered stable as they might change depending on various factors --
> like the order in which modules are loaded or other timing issues (like
> in this case). That is how it is afaik (even if it's not well known),
> and that's why I didn't include the issue; let me know if you think it
> should be on the list.
> OTOH I included "Commit cb4f71c429 deliberately changes order of
> network interfaces" (http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2325600.html )
> for now, as I think traditional network interface names (eth0, eth1, ...)
> might be considered stable -- but I'm not sure, that's why I raise it
> Anyway, you know the drill: Are you aware of any other regressions?
> Then please let me know. And tell me if there is anything in the
> report that shouldn't be there.
> Ciao, Thorsten
> P.S.: Thanks to all those that Aaro Koskinen, Hans de Goede, Pavel
> Machek for CCing me when reporting regressions. Much appreciated! Ohh,
> and thx to all those that replied when I asked them for status updates
> when things look stuck.
Hmm, and there's one more apparently. See
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:38:45 +0200
From: Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
Cc: kernel list <email@example.com>, daniel.vet...@intel.com,
dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
Subject: Re: 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr
User-Agent: KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.8.0-rc6-tp520-btrfstrim+; KDE/5.25.0; x86_64;
I'm glad I'm not the only one seeing it, but I don't have idea how to
actually debug it.
Thanks and best regards,