On 09/16/2016 08:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> A: No.
> Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
> http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 06:41:38PM +0800, zerons wrote:
>> these marcos are used to get the value or address of a member of a `__iomem` 
>> structure.
>> GET_FIELDADDR is like &iomem_obj->field, and
>> GET_FIELD32 is iomem_obj->u32val, GET_FIELD64 is iomem_obj->u64val.
>> If patch the .c file directly, the source gets into a mess.
> But add the macro, and then use it, in the same patch, so we can verify
> that this macro really is doing what you think it is doing, and so that
> it is used at the same time (no need to add a macro that no one uses...
> thanks,
> greg k-h

Again, sorry about the `top-posting`. I am still not familiar with these
things, thanks for reminding me, I will follow the rules and try my best
not to waste your time.

Ok, I will add the macro and use it to fix the warning in the same patch,
and resend the patches.

Reply via email to