On Sep 16, 2016 12:51 AM, "Peter Zijlstra" <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:08:07PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > BTW, Mike keeps mentioning exclusive cgroups as problematic with the > > no-internal-tasks constraints. Do exclusive cgroups still exist in > > cgroup2? Could we perhaps just remove that capability entirely? I've > > never understood what problem exlusive cpusets and such solve that > > can't be more comprehensibly solved by just assigning the cpusets the > > normal inclusive way. > > Without exclusive sets we cannot split the sched_domain structure. > Which leads to not being able to actually partition things. That would > break DL for one.
Can you sketch out a toy example? And what's DL?
