On 09/16/2016 04:43 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
From: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristians...@saunalahti.fi>
OpenRISC was not an SMP architecture last I looked... did the relevant
spec updates get made? If not, NAK.
The issue is, the OpenRISC architecture shouldn't be a moving target
defined by what the kernel supports... there's a spec that the kernel
conforms to. This is important for the (few) real users of the
Signed-off-by: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristians...@saunalahti.fi>
Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com>
arch/openrisc/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
index 489e7f9..2bcf8c3 100644
@@ -98,6 +98,20 @@ config OPENRISC_HAVE_INST_DIV
Select this if your implementation has a hardware divide instruction
+ int "Maximum number of CPUs (2-32)"
+ range 2 32
+ depends on SMP
+ default "2"
+ bool "Symmetric Multi-Processing support"
+ This enables support for systems with more than one CPU. If you have
+ a system with only one CPU, say N. If you have a system with more
+ than one CPU, say Y.
+ If you don't know what to do here, say N.