On 09/19/2016 06:21 PM, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
> 
> Thank you for your patches. I applied them, and verified that
> unwinding works with code that is compiled into the kernel image as
> well as kernel modules.
> I confirmed that the .eh_frame section is present and that the
> .debug_frame section is absent. I also verified that the file size of
> the .ko files are small enough for our embedded platform and that
> unnecessary sections like .debug_info, .debug_line, .debug_str etc.
> are also absent.
> Is there anything else you want me to test?
> Thanks
> Daniel

Nope - that is it. Just wanted to make sure it is "field" tested :-)

Thx,
-Vineet


> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Vineet Gupta
> <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Give these a shot and let me know if they work fine for you.
>> I'm working on some more improvements to unwinder which will follow
>> a bit later.
>>
>> Thx,
>> -Vineet
>>
>> Vineet Gupta (3):
>>   ARC: module: support R_ARC_32_PCREL relocation
>>   ARC: dw2 unwind: factor CIE specifics for .eh_frame/.debug_frame
>>   ARC: dw2 unwind: switch to .eh_frame based unwinding
>>
>>  arch/arc/Makefile             |  2 ++
>>  arch/arc/include/asm/elf.h    |  3 +--
>>  arch/arc/kernel/entry.S       | 12 ------------
>>  arch/arc/kernel/module.c      | 19 ++++++++-----------
>>  arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c      | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>>  arch/arc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 15 +++++----------
>>  6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
> 

Reply via email to