On 09/21/16 06:52, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:33:23AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Fixes compiler warning on 64bit architectures.
> 
> Would be good to give the warning message here

Let me revert this patch and patch #2 for the eDMA to get the warnings.

I will repost v2 with the updated commit messages.

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 10 ++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> index e4f3bd1ae264..876e4ccaf033 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> @@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
>>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_dma.h>
>>  
>> -#define TI_XBAR_DRA7                0
>> -#define TI_XBAR_AM335X              1
>> +enum ti_xbar_type {
>> +    TI_XBAR_DRA7 = 0,
>> +    TI_XBAR_AM335X,
>> +};
>>  
>>  static const struct of_device_id ti_dma_xbar_match[] = {
>>      {
>> @@ -395,7 +397,7 @@ static int ti_dra7_xbar_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>>  
>>      xbar->dmarouter.dev = &pdev->dev;
>>      xbar->dmarouter.route_free = ti_dra7_xbar_free;
>> -    xbar->dma_offset = (u32)match->data;
>> +    xbar->dma_offset = (enum ti_xbar_type)match->data;
>>  
>>      mutex_init(&xbar->mutex);
>>      platform_set_drvdata(pdev, xbar);
>> @@ -428,7 +430,7 @@ static int ti_dma_xbar_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>>      if (unlikely(!match))
>>              return -EINVAL;
>>  
>> -    switch ((u32)match->data) {
>> +    switch ((enum ti_xbar_type)match->data) {
>>      case TI_XBAR_DRA7:
>>              ret = ti_dra7_xbar_probe(pdev);
>>              break;
>> -- 
>> 2.10.0
>>
> 


-- 
P├ęter

Reply via email to