>> A special view on software simplicity can also lead to questionable
>> intermediate
>> function implementation, can't it?
>
> I don't really follow. But in any case I do not see anything
> questionable in the current tilcdc_convert_slave_node() implementation.
I identified update candidates there like the following.
1. Delayed checking for null pointers
…
if (!slave || !of_device_is_available(lcdc))
…
2. Usage of a single jump label for (too many?) cases
…
goto out;
…
Can the corresponding exception handling become also a bit more efficient?
>> Would you like to care a bit more for efficiency and software correctness
>> around the discussed exception handling?
>
> No, I would not.
Thanks for this information.
I hope that the software situation can also be improved around
this design aspect somehow.
> For the moment I have more important tasks to do.
I know also that various open issues are competing for your software
development attention as usual.
Regards,
Markus
