On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:21:32AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > I suspect there is a bunch of places that use in_interrupt(), but mean > the same as KCOV wants -- am I in interrupt? and not am I in interrupt > context or in normal task context but inside local_bh_disable(). For > example, why does fput handles closure asynchronously if the task > called local_bh_disable?
Agreed, but it would mean auditing all in_interrupt()/irq_count() users.
