Re: [PATCH -v2 5/9] rtmutex: Clean up

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> Can this be rephrased to: "Returns true if preemption has been
> disabled and a call to rt_mutex_postunlock() is required (which will
> re-enable preemption)"

I agree with Steven that the comments should be rephrased.

Thanks,

        tglx