On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 22:39 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 13:24 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 21:43 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > Why doesn't that regex match on "ORIGIN_HASH_SIZE"? > > It does match. > If that regex does match, it being part of a negative test, the > specific checkpatch rule should be silent, shouldn't it?
'cause I forgot to trim() the original $4 and $10 matches. Oh well. It doesn't matter match either way to me. The case for the unnecessary multiply with <= gcc 4.8 was removed with: commit 91c6a05f72a996bee5133e76374ab3ad7d3b9b72 Author: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jul 26 15:22:08 2016 -0700 mm: faster kmalloc_array(), kcalloc() When both arguments to kmalloc_array() or kcalloc() are known at compile time then their product is known at compile time but search for kmalloc cache happens at runtime not at compile time. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Cc: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
