From: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>

Move all handling of the next state FPU state handling into
switch_fpu_finish, in preparation for more lazily switching
FPU states.

CR0.TS state is mirrored in a per-cpu variable, instead of
being passed around in a local variable, because that will
not be possible later in the series.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c          |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c        |  5 +--
 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c        |  5 +--
 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
index 2737366ea583..79e1cee9f3b0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
@@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ extern int copy_fpstate_to_sigframe(void __user *buf, void 
__user *fp, int size)
  */
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct fpu *, fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(bool, fpu_active);
 
 /*
  * Must be run with preemption disabled: this clears the fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx,
@@ -577,28 +578,15 @@ static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
  *
  * This is a two-stage process:
  *
- *  - switch_fpu_prepare() saves the old state and
- *    sets the new state of the CR0.TS bit. This is
- *    done within the context of the old process.
+ *  - switch_fpu_prepare() saves the old state.
+ *    This is done within the context of the old process.
  *
- *  - switch_fpu_finish() restores the new state as
- *    necessary.
+ *  - switch_fpu_finish() restores the new state
+ *    and flips CR0.TS as necessary.
  */
-typedef struct { int preload; } fpu_switch_t;
-
-static inline fpu_switch_t
-switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct fpu *new_fpu, int cpu)
+static inline void
+switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, int cpu)
 {
-       fpu_switch_t fpu;
-
-       /*
-        * If the task has used the math, pre-load the FPU on xsave processors
-        * or if the past 5 consecutive context-switches used math.
-        */
-       fpu.preload = static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU) &&
-                     new_fpu->fpstate_active &&
-                     (use_eager_fpu() || new_fpu->counter > 5);
-
        if (old_fpu->fpregs_active) {
                if (!copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(old_fpu))
                        old_fpu->last_cpu = -1;
@@ -608,29 +596,10 @@ switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct fpu 
*new_fpu, int cpu)
                /* But leave fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx! */
                old_fpu->fpregs_active = 0;
                trace_x86_fpu_regs_deactivated(old_fpu);
-
-               /* Don't change CR0.TS if we just switch! */
-               if (fpu.preload) {
-                       new_fpu->counter++;
-                       __fpregs_activate(new_fpu);
-                       trace_x86_fpu_regs_activated(new_fpu);
-                       prefetch(&new_fpu->state);
-               } else {
-                       __fpregs_deactivate_hw();
-               }
        } else {
                old_fpu->counter = 0;
                old_fpu->last_cpu = -1;
-               if (fpu.preload) {
-                       new_fpu->counter++;
-                       if (fpu_want_lazy_restore(new_fpu, cpu))
-                               fpu.preload = 0;
-                       else
-                               prefetch(&new_fpu->state);
-                       fpregs_activate(new_fpu);
-               }
        }
-       return fpu;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -638,15 +607,36 @@ switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct fpu 
*new_fpu, int cpu)
  */
 
 /*
- * By the time this gets called, we've already cleared CR0.TS and
- * given the process the FPU if we are going to preload the FPU
- * state - all we need to do is to conditionally restore the register
- * state itself.
+ * Set up the userspace FPU context for the new task.
  */
-static inline void switch_fpu_finish(struct fpu *new_fpu, fpu_switch_t 
fpu_switch)
+static inline void switch_fpu_finish(struct fpu *new_fpu)
 {
-       if (fpu_switch.preload)
+       bool preload;
+       /*
+        * If the task has used the math, pre-load the FPU on xsave processors
+        * or if the past 5 consecutive context-switches used math.
+        */
+       preload = static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU) &&
+                 new_fpu->fpstate_active &&
+                 (use_eager_fpu() || new_fpu->counter > 5);
+
+       if (preload) {
+               prefetch(&new_fpu->state);
+               new_fpu->counter++;
+               __fpregs_activate(new_fpu);
+               trace_x86_fpu_regs_activated(new_fpu);
+
+               /* Don't change CR0.TS if we just switch! */
+               if (!__this_cpu_read(fpu_active)) {
+                       __fpregs_activate_hw();
+                       __this_cpu_write(fpu_active, true);
+               }
+
                copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&new_fpu->state);
+       } else if (__this_cpu_read(fpu_active)) {
+               __this_cpu_write(fpu_active, false);
+               __fpregs_deactivate_hw();
+       }
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
index 3fc03a09a93b..82cd46584528 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, in_kernel_fpu);
  * Track which context is using the FPU on the CPU:
  */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct fpu *, fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, fpu_active) = false;
 
 static void kernel_fpu_disable(void)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index d86be29c38c7..8cd2f42190dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -247,11 +247,10 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct 
task_struct *next_p)
        struct fpu *next_fpu = &next->fpu;
        int cpu = smp_processor_id();
        struct tss_struct *tss = &per_cpu(cpu_tss, cpu);
-       fpu_switch_t fpu_switch;
 
        /* never put a printk in __switch_to... printk() calls wake_up*() 
indirectly */
 
-       fpu_switch = switch_fpu_prepare(prev_fpu, next_fpu, cpu);
+       switch_fpu_prepare(prev_fpu, cpu);
 
        /*
         * Save away %gs. No need to save %fs, as it was saved on the
@@ -310,7 +309,7 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct 
*next_p)
        if (prev->gs | next->gs)
                lazy_load_gs(next->gs);
 
-       switch_fpu_finish(next_fpu, fpu_switch);
+       switch_fpu_finish(next_fpu);
 
        this_cpu_write(current_task, next_p);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index 63236d8f84bf..92b9485a6a18 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -264,9 +264,8 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct 
*next_p)
        int cpu = smp_processor_id();
        struct tss_struct *tss = &per_cpu(cpu_tss, cpu);
        unsigned prev_fsindex, prev_gsindex;
-       fpu_switch_t fpu_switch;
 
-       fpu_switch = switch_fpu_prepare(prev_fpu, next_fpu, cpu);
+       switch_fpu_prepare(prev_fpu, cpu);
 
        /* We must save %fs and %gs before load_TLS() because
         * %fs and %gs may be cleared by load_TLS().
@@ -416,7 +415,7 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct 
*next_p)
                prev->gsbase = 0;
        prev->gsindex = prev_gsindex;
 
-       switch_fpu_finish(next_fpu, fpu_switch);
+       switch_fpu_finish(next_fpu);
 
        /*
         * Switch the PDA and FPU contexts.
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to