On Oct 1, 2016 1:49 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> > > Move all handling of the next state FPU state handling into > switch_fpu_finish, in preparation for more lazily switching > FPU states. > > CR0.TS state is mirrored in a per-cpu variable, instead of > being passed around in a local variable, because that will > not be possible later in the series.
This seems reasonable in principle, but IMO it would be less scary if you rebased onto this: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/log/?h=x86/fpu Because the amount of testing needed and the amount of code that gets rearranged would be reduced. Want to fold those patches into you series? I can also just send them in directly, although this is an awkward time to do so. --Andy
