> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 03:42:25PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > I've looked to the registration code and it indeed has few more > > > issues > > ? > > > > Maybe TPM_CHIP_FLAG_REGISTERED can be used for sealing the access to > > > the device during deregistration, current usage is void. > > This is done via chip->ops = NULL and the rwlock scheme. I'm not this is the best choice, kind of unusual in the subsystems. > > > Good catch BTW. This flag has gone quite obsolote. > > I think all the drivers have been updated at this point so we can probably get > rid of it entirely.
I would actually keep it for the tpm2_shutdown exception, not sure this can be handled by ops = NULL and rwlock. Thanks Tomas > > Jason
