Am 07.10.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Benjamin Tissoires:
> On Oct 03 2016 or thereabouts, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Mon 2016-10-03 10:16:26, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>
>>> u8 (and friends) can be used directly in kernel sources (not kernel
>>> headers).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
>>
>> Zero day bot warned me that this is not quiet correct.
>>
>> This would be needed on top. Is there interest in fixed patch?
>
> Having both __ and not __ in the same driver would be a little bit
> weird. So I'd say we just continue with the existing code. Thanks for
> the submission BTW!
>
Reason for me to choose the __ types here was that hid_hw_raw_request
defines the buffer argument as "__u8 *buf" and I wanted to be in line
with that.
> Cheers,
> Benjamin
>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-led.c b/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
>> index cd208ca..be659ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-led.c
>> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ union delcom_packet {
>> u8 cmd;
>> } rx;
>> struct {
>> - le16 family_code;
>> - le16 security_code;
>> + __le16 family_code;
>> + __le16 security_code;
>> u8 fw_version;
>> } fw;
>> };
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
