Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86/acpi: Introduce persistent storage for cpuid <-> apicid mapping

[Dou Liyang]

Hi tglx,

At 10/07/2016 09:07 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Dou Liyang wrote:

+       if (processor->id >= 255) {
+               ++disabled_cpus;

Incrementing disabled_cpus here is simply wrong because 0xff is an invalid
local APIC id. So we can simply return -EINVAL and be done with it.

Yes, It is.

+               return -EINVAL;

Thanks,

        tglx

Thanks,

        Dou