On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Adam Manzanares
<adam.manzana...@hgst.com> wrote:
> Patch adds an association between iocontext ioprio and the ioprio of a
> request. This value is set in blk_rq_set_prio which takes the request and
> the ioc as arguments. If the ioc is valid in blk_rq_set_prio then the
> iopriority of the request is set as the iopriority of the ioc. In
> init_request_from_bio a check is made to see if the ioprio of the bio is
> valid and if so then the request prio comes from the bio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Manzananares <adam.manzana...@wdc.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c       |  4 +++-
>  include/linux/blkdev.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 14d7c07..361b1b9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ static struct request *__get_request(struct 
> request_list *rl, int op,
>
>         blk_rq_init(q, rq);
>         blk_rq_set_rl(rq, rl);
> +       blk_rq_set_prio(rq, ioc);
>         req_set_op_attrs(rq, op, op_flags | REQ_ALLOCED);
>
>         /* init elvpriv */
> @@ -1656,7 +1657,8 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct 
> bio *bio)
>
>         req->errors = 0;
>         req->__sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
> -       req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);
> +       if (ioprio_valid(bio_prio(bio)))
> +               req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);

Should we use ioprio_best() here?  If req->ioprio and bio_prio()
disagree one side has explicitly asked for a higher priority.

Reply via email to