On Monday 10 October 2016 10:26 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:19:28PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>>
>> On Monday 10 October 2016 10:09 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>>> On 2016/10/10 01:24PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>> Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:29:02PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>>>>> Move arch specific stuff from util/annotate.c to their respective
>>>>> files in util/annotate directory.
>>>>>
>>>>> No functionality changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bango...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  tools/perf/util/Build              |   1 +
>>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c         | 259 
>>>>> +++----------------------------------
>>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate.h         |  23 ++++
>>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/Build     |   3 +
>>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/arm.c     |  50 +++++++
>>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/powerpc.c |  63 +++++++++
>>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/x86.c     | 107 +++++++++++++++
>>>> We already have a per arch area: tools/perf/arch/
>>> I think this was done to support cross-arch annotate similar to the 
>>> remote unwind support with util/libunwind/
>> Yes, because tools/perf/arch/ will only include host arch code.
> Ok, thanks for clarifying.

Hi Arnaldo,

Are you ok with this patchset. Please let me know if you want to respin it.

-Ravi

> - Arnaldo
>

Reply via email to