Em Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:13:38PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> 
> 
> On Monday 10 October 2016 10:26 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:19:28PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> >>
> >> On Monday 10 October 2016 10:09 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> >>> On 2016/10/10 01:24PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>>> Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:29:02PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> >>>>> Move arch specific stuff from util/annotate.c to their respective
> >>>>> files in util/annotate directory.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No functionality changes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bango...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  tools/perf/util/Build              |   1 +
> >>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c         | 259 
> >>>>> +++----------------------------------
> >>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate.h         |  23 ++++
> >>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/Build     |   3 +
> >>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/arm.c     |  50 +++++++
> >>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/powerpc.c |  63 +++++++++
> >>>>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/x86.c     | 107 +++++++++++++++
> >>>> We already have a per arch area: tools/perf/arch/
> >>> I think this was done to support cross-arch annotate similar to the 
> >>> remote unwind support with util/libunwind/
> >> Yes, because tools/perf/arch/ will only include host arch code.
> > Ok, thanks for clarifying.
> 
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> Are you ok with this patchset. Please let me know if you want to respin it.

We're in the merge window, and I'm having to deal with other patches
requiring more work than I was expecting to invest on them, so no time
to revisit this, sorry, but I have not forgot about it, will get back to
it as time permits,

Thanks,

- Arnaldo
 
> -Ravi
> 
> > - Arnaldo
> >

Reply via email to