Hello, Michael.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:24:34PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> The bad case (where we hit the BUG_ON I added above) is where we are
> creating a wq for node 1.
> In wq_calc_node_cpumask() we do:
>       cpumask_and(cpumask, attrs->cpumask, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
>       return !cpumask_equal(cpumask, attrs->cpumask);
> Which with the arguments inserted is:
>       cpumask_and(tmp_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, 
> wq_numa_possible_cpumask[1]);
>       return !cpumask_equal(tmp_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask);
> And that results in tmp_attrs->cpumask being empty, because
> wq_numa_possible_cpumask[1] is an empty cpumask.

Ah, should have read this before replying to the previous mail, so
it's the numa mask, not the cpu_possible_mask.

> The reason wq_numa_possible_cpumask[1] is an empty mask is because in
> wq_numa_init() we did:
>       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>               node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
>               if (WARN_ON(node == NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
>                       pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for 
> cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n", cpu);
>                       /* happens iff arch is bonkers, let's just proceed */
>                       return;
>               }
>               cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tbl[node]);
>       }
> And cpu_to_node() returned node 0 for every CPU in the system, despite there
> being multiple nodes.
> That happened because we haven't yet called set_cpu_numa_node() for the 
> non-boot
> cpus, because that happens in smp_prepare_cpus(), and
> workqueue_init_early() is called much earlier than that.
> This doesn't trigger on x86 because it does set_cpu_numa_node() in
> setup_per_cpu_areas(), which is called prior to workqueue_init_early().
> We can (should) probably do the same on powerpc, I'll look at that
> tomorrow. But other arches may have a similar problem, and at the very
> least we need to document that workqueue_init_early() relies on
> cpu_to_node() working.

I should be able to move the numa part of initialization to the later
init function.  Working on it.



Reply via email to