On Wed 19-10-16 21:59:40, Leon Yu wrote: [...] > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c > index c2964d890c9a..598d08936a3c 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/base.c > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c > @@ -1007,6 +1007,9 @@ static ssize_t auxv_read(struct file *file, char __user > *buf, > { > struct mm_struct *mm = file->private_data; > unsigned int nwords = 0; > + > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mm)) > + return PTR_ERR(mm); > do { > nwords += 2; > } while (mm->saved_auxv[nwords - 2] != 0); /* AT_NULL */
Why would we even want to open that file if there is no mm struct? Wouldn't something like this be better? ESRCH might be a bit unexpected for an existing pid but I am not sure what would be a better error code. --- diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c index 5ef2ae81f623..d34d33dbf1b2 100644 --- a/fs/proc/base.c +++ b/fs/proc/base.c @@ -804,10 +804,10 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_single_file_operations = { struct mm_struct *proc_mem_open(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode) { struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode); - struct mm_struct *mm = ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); + struct mm_struct *ret = ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); if (task) { - mm = mm_access(task, mode | PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS); + struct mm_struct *mm = mm_access(task, mode | PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS); put_task_struct(task); if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mm)) { @@ -815,10 +815,11 @@ struct mm_struct *proc_mem_open(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode) atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count); /* but do not pin its memory */ mmput(mm); + ret = mm; } } - return mm; + return ret; } static int __mem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int mode) -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs