On Wed 19-10-16 21:59:40, Leon Yu wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index c2964d890c9a..598d08936a3c 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1007,6 +1007,9 @@ static ssize_t auxv_read(struct file *file, char __user 
> *buf,
>  {
>       struct mm_struct *mm = file->private_data;
>       unsigned int nwords = 0;
> +
> +     if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mm))
> +             return PTR_ERR(mm);
>       do {
>               nwords += 2;
>       } while (mm->saved_auxv[nwords - 2] != 0); /* AT_NULL */

Why would we even want to open that file if there is no mm struct?
Wouldn't something like this be better? ESRCH might be a bit unexpected
for an existing pid but I am not sure what would be a better error code.
---
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 5ef2ae81f623..d34d33dbf1b2 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -804,10 +804,10 @@ static const struct file_operations 
proc_single_file_operations = {
 struct mm_struct *proc_mem_open(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode)
 {
        struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
-       struct mm_struct *mm = ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
+       struct mm_struct *ret = ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
 
        if (task) {
-               mm = mm_access(task, mode | PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS);
+               struct mm_struct *mm = mm_access(task, mode | 
PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS);
                put_task_struct(task);
 
                if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mm)) {
@@ -815,10 +815,11 @@ struct mm_struct *proc_mem_open(struct inode *inode, 
unsigned int mode)
                        atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
                        /* but do not pin its memory */
                        mmput(mm);
+                       ret = mm;
                }
        }
 
-       return mm;
+       return ret;
 }
 
 static int __mem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int 
mode)
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to