On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Bolle wrote: > [Added Nicolas.] > > On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 21:06 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > 2016-10-20 19:04 GMT+09:00 Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>: > > > Is there a reason to keep using the double underscore prefix? > > > > I followed the suggestion in the following message: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/6/944 > > Nicolas: was there any specific reason to suggest __is_defined() and > not, say, is_defined()?
Not really, except maybe to keep more distance from the defined() preprocessor macro. But I don't have a strong opinion either ways. Nicolas
