On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:24:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi > <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com> wrote: > > Rafael, Joerg (and anyone else CC'ed), > > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 05:03:58PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >> This patch series is v6 of a previous posting: > >> > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/9/418 > >> > >> v5 -> v6 > >> - Rebased against v4.9-rc1 > >> - Changed FWNODE_IOMMU to FWNODE_ACPI_STATIC > >> - Moved platform devices creation into IORT code > >> - Updated fwnode handling > >> - Added default dma masks initialization > > > > Any comments on v6 ? Patches touching generic ACPI code > > are {1, 2, 7}, patch 4 updates the IOMMU of_iommu_{set/get}_ops() > > API to make it work on ACPI systems too, by replacing the > > device_node with a fwnode_handle pointer as look-up token; > > the remainder of patches are ARM specific and creates the > > infrastructure to probe ARM SMMU devices through ACPI, > > ARM IORT table in particular. Given the generic bits changes > > above I would not leave it to late -rc to reach an agreement > > please, thank you. > > I'll do my best to look at these in the next few days, but please also > note what I wrote before: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=147744344531599&w=2
Thanks, understood, I asked because if I have to respin it I'd like to do it asap and the generic ACPI patches are simple but fundamental to the series, anyway I think it is something we can manage next week at LPC. Thanks ! Lorenzo
