On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 06:11:10PM +0530, Hardik Shah wrote:

> +static inline void get_t_size(size_t *t_val_size, size_t *t_size,
> +                                             int *reg_addr,
> +                                             int *offset,
> +                                             size_t *val_size)
> +{
> +
> +             *t_val_size += *t_size;
> +             *offset += *t_size;

So, I started by taking a look at this patch to get a sense of what the
API would look like and I see that we're not following CodingStyle with
everything indented twice :(

> +static int regmap_sdw_gather_write(void *context,
> +                        const void *reg, size_t reg_size,
> +                        const void *val, size_t val_size)
> +{

> +     if (!sdw)
> +             return 0;

Silently ignoring errors :(

> +     if (val_size > SDW_MAX_REG_ADDR)
> +             t_size = SDW_MAX_REG_ADDR - reg_command;
> +     else
> +             t_size = val_size;

This needs at least some kind of comment?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to